Referee Assessment Form

founded 2003

Referee Assessment Form

Your Name

Title

E-mail address

Name of Association:

Name of Referee
Name of Referee's Partner

Site of match

Date of match

Final score

T E A M S SCORE

Please use the following scale as a guideline. PRA assessments are being offered to assist the official in improving their refereeing skills.

Outstanding:	(demonstrates competence and is able to teach others)

Good:	(demonstrates competence in this area)

Fair:	(demonstrates a need for improvement)

Poor:	(needs significant improvement)

* All grades of "POOR" require a written explanation please site the NFHS High School Rule)

PROFESSIONALISM and CONDUCT

OUTSTANDING

GOOD

FAIR

POOR

n/a

Timely arrival for start of match (in time for pre-game meeting and meet with desk personnel)

Proper uniform: ( white apparel, shoes, hat (if applicable), with whistle and yellow/red cards)

Demonstrated professional mannerisms when dealing with coaches, players, and or spectators

Comment (include explanation)

FOUL CALLING (click on topic for rule book definition. note that this feature may not be available with the Safari browser)

OUTSTANDING

GOOD

FAIR

POOR

n/a

Advantage Rule (the calls were consistent so that an advantage was not taken away?)

Ordinary fouls, including those at 2 meters (were called consistently, and were called in compliance with the rule book?)

Perimeter fouls ("hard" fouls were called consistently, and were called in compliance with the rule book ?)

Exclusion fouls (were called consistently, and were called in compliance with the rule book?)

Penalty fouls (were called consistently, and were called in compliance with the rule book?)

Flagrant misconduct calls (all acts of flagrant misconduct (formerly called brutality) were called?)

Yellow/red card penalties (the cards issued were warranted?, should there have been more?)

Intensity level (The match was competitive throughout, rate as outstanding or good:, it was one sided, rate as fair or poor)

Comment (include explanation)

REFEREE MECHANICS (for overall match)

OUTSTANDING

GOOD

FAIR

POOR

n/a

Consistency of officiating (the same calls were made at the end of the game as in the beginning?)

Flow of the match (the flow of the game was not interrupted by an excess of "ball out" calls, insignificant fouls called?)

Clear hand signals (were they easy to see, interpret?)

Clear whistle signals (differentiation between one or two whistles for offensive fouls? loud enough?)

Control of match conduct (inappropriate behavior/ over-aggressive behavior was not tolerated?)

Partner relationship (referees worked as a team, entire playing course was covered consistently?)